|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 29 post(s) |
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
   |
Posted - 2014.05.18 07:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Give me 1 good reason why a 6.5 billion isk ship (7.5 soon), wich needs a second account to be able to work (cynos) is in need of nerfing? Literally, 1 good reason? It costs half a ******* super as it is already.
You know, im not sure what i like more, the old ccp that didnt lissen to their members and changed stuff around slowly but fairly, or the new ccp that wants constant input from their members and then drasticly changes **** without there being any need for it... |
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 07:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Mag's wrote:Ahh so I was also correct and did in fact say this would happen. I shall now join the 'Told you so' group.
Always, always be careful what you wish for. i think we're getting some t-shirts made up.
I think the 'I told you so' guys should start a new thread and start backpadding around in there, because its getting pretty annoying in this one. |
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 07:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Gumpy Bitterhawk wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Mag's wrote:Ahh so I was also correct and did in fact say this would happen. I shall now join the 'Told you so' group.
Always, always be careful what you wish for. i think we're getting some t-shirts made up. I think the 'I told you so' guys should start a new thread and start backpadding around in there, because its getting pretty annoying in this one. We had to put up with some quite distasteful abuse, when we were informing those that asked for this change. In almost each and every thread that came along. So excuse me for laughing at your request and saying the following. Told you so.
So, what you are trying to say is, you got trolled, and thats a good excuse to **** up the thread with 'i told you so' **** every 2 or so posts? Get out.
|
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 08:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Gumpy Bitterhawk wrote:Mag's wrote:We had to put up with some quite distasteful abuse, when we were informing those that asked for this change. In almost each and every thread that came along. So excuse me for laughing at your request and saying the following.
Told you so. So, what you are trying to say is, you got trolled, and thats a good excuse to **** up the thread with 'i told you so' **** every 2 or so posts? Get out. You may wish to label the ones asking for this change, trolls. Seeing the reaction to the changes we predicted, you may indeed be correct. Which only goes to make this change even funnier. We told you so.
The only troll i see here is you. |
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 15:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
Loki Feiht wrote:I suppose this could set the stage for a new tech 2 freighter with a similar principle in mind to the old deep space transports (ie lower capacity but very tough)
So people need to have two 7billion isk ships to get their hauling (i mean work) done? Yeah sure that'll make it all easier lol. |
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 16:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
Buzz Dura wrote:without at least 2 T1 cargo rig, you can't transport CSAA or ihub...
Nice point. And what about high tier ihub upgrades? You already need a freighter to carry some of these, cause jf's holds are too small for those. |
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.19 07:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:
you whine like a ***** about a change people have asked for for a long time, fozzie on the other hand has merely given people what they ask for (which is something most other companies won't even consider doing).
55 pages later and you are still shitting up the thread with your 'told you so' comments.
People asked for customization options, not a total nerf to pretty much all important stats, and then a 1.5b isk solution to unfuck one of those nerfs. That it had to come at some penalty p much everyone knew, but not a goddamn nerf across the board.
Plus, most of the people you are trolling right now with your ****** comments are actually people that never asked for anything as far as freighters and jump freighers go (running logistics is already enough of a ****** job as it stands), and got into this thread by reading about the major (!) changes they are planning to make. So tell me, is there any specefic reason you mention the 'told you so' thing in about every post you make here, other then trolling or boasting? |
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.19 08:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Gumpy Bitterhawk wrote:So tell me, is there any specefic reason you mention the 'told you so' thing in about every post you make here, other then trolling or boasting? because it's still more constructive than the constant whining going on, since you know... we've already had the discussion about freighters getting rigs in several other threads over the last god knows how long. people who wanted something for nothing obviously weren't going to get it; freighters were already balanced, if you wanted extra things it was obvious you had to give something up for it. this is also a feedback thread; i've given my feedback. other people have simply come in here and just cried, and stomped feet, and been less constructive than me. however apparently your issue is with me. interesting. I don't really want any of these changes, just like most other people. the difference is, i'm not whining about it.
Telling random people who complain about these changes 'i told you so', indifferent if they have anything to or not to do with asking for these changes, every other post you make, isnt constructive, and is far from feedback. So again, poaching or trolling?
|
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1
|
Posted - 2014.05.19 08:27:00 -
[9] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:
actually, it is constructive when people keep asking "why?" which, they do.
it's rude not to answer people's questions.
It might be rude to not answer peoples questions, but im pretty sure they would rather have no answer then a random and indifferent 'i told you so' comment from you.
People like you remind me why i stopped reading eveo forums years ago. |
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1
|
Posted - 2014.05.19 09:14:00 -
[10] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Gumpy Bitterhawk wrote:People like you remind me why i stopped reading eveo forums years ago.
people like you are the reason i read it daily. because all of your recent posts are just attacking me and not giving any feedback (you know, the very thing you've accused me of (falsely, i might add)).
The reason people read this thread is because they are interested in what ccp has in store for jumpfreighters and freighters. I happen to make money from building freighters and jumpfreighters, so, beside all the hauling i do myself, these changes are going to impact me possibly more then the average logi guy.
Now, reading trough this lot with all the whining about these (really harsh) changes and sift out the good ideas/devposts is one thing, but what really pisses me off is this bunch of kids who have been trying to **** up the thread from page one with these 'told you so' comments. Really, if all you want is some backpadding because you predicted something, got trolled about it, are butthurt, and now want some revenge or something, please, go start a own thread in some offtopic section where you can go troll amonghts your 'told you so' fanclub. Adding no feedback at all is still better then whatever you are trying to do.
And as far as my feedback goes (who the f cares anyway), i gave that already somewhere of the start of this thread. I think they both could use tweaks, yes. I think they should have some level of modification, yes. But not by nerfing the ships in all their major aspects and then giving you an option (lol, nessecity) to unfuck one of those stats at a 1.5b price tag (wich is a false level of modification anyways as you cannot unfit rigs). The idea Mynna came up with is like a thousand times better thought trough then what ccp came up with. |
|
|
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
6
|
Posted - 2014.05.21 14:59:00 -
[11] - Quote
THANK YOU MYNNNA, THANK YOU FOZZIE |
Gumpy Bitterhawk
Fweddit
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
6
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 14:45:00 -
[12] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:Walter Hart White wrote:Pensador wrote:Thank God. For years all of we were expecting that.
Maybe this is the end of Ganking freighters
in high sec That will never end. But it will raise the safe for transport value of goods. And that is a good thing. safety is not good in eve. Saftey promotes complacency. Risk rewards effort. u want things to be difficult because u want to be rewarded for ur efforts and risk. U want ur competition to lose out because they are lazy and/or died in a fire. Complacency leads to bigger whales. Bigger whales will be at risk.
Frankly, Japan and Norway dont give no *****. |
|
|
| |
|